blboys.com banned from google.com

Webmaster Discussion
, , , ,
#1

Google.com strikes back again banning the famous teen/twink gay porn tgp www.blboys.com. This kind of things makes me scared :grrr:

#2

Re: blboys.com banned from google.com

I feel weird for visiting that site.
I know the models are supposed to be older than 18.
but some of them are made to look way younger…
http://www.blboys.com/st/thumbs/017/4235021635.jpg agh
http://www.blboys.com/st/thumbs/040/1781247063.jpg
http://www.blboys.com/st/thumbs/016/9669271986.jpg

#3

Re: blboys.com banned from google.com

[QUOTE=tmt-Walter;13621]I feel weird for visiting that site.
I know the models are supposed to be older than 18.
but some of them are made to look way younger…
http://www.blboys.com/st/thumbs/017/4235021635.jpg agh
http://www.blboys.com/st/thumbs/040/1781247063.jpg
http://www.blboys.com/st/thumbs/016/9669271986.jpg[/QUOTE]

Those thumbs are linked to pornplays.com. I know the owner of pornplay.com and he’s a good guy, hard worker and really skilled adult webmaster. I’m sure that he doesn’t promote anything not/barely legal. The sponsor that he promotes on his galleries for those 3 thumbs are:

So 3 well known sponsors. Nothing wrong with them.

#4

Re: blboys.com banned from google.com

I never said they were underage . but they give ME that vibe.
I randomly picked those pics.
I really don’t care how skilled or hard worker someone is, I would never promote anything using thumbs like that.
My personal point of view.

#5

Re: blboys.com banned from google.com

[QUOTE=tmt-Walter;13624]I never said they were underage . but they give ME that vibe.
I randomly picked those pics.
I really don’t care how skilled or hard worker someone is, I would never promote anything using thumbs like that.
My personal point of view.[/QUOTE]

Points of view. In the past 3 years I talked about this issue so many times that now I say “points of views”. :smiley:

#6

Re: blboys.com banned from google.com

It raises a lot of interesting questions. If someone photographed models covered in chocolate but strongly suggested in the text on the page that it was poop, how many people would be prepared to promote that? A rape scene might be staged and models completely willing and happy about it, but does that make it OK to promote? If models are over 18 but look much younger, is that OK?

I have to agree with Walter. That page makes me want to run a mile. Whether it is legal or not the intention seems to be to feature youths who look under 18 and that idea is encouraged by the text.

I only promote guys who are over 18 and look over 18.

#7

Re: blboys.com banned from google.com

I don’t get it.

#8

Re: blboys.com banned from google.com

[QUOTE=DirtyRatStudios;13626]It raises a lot of interesting questions. If someone photographed models covered in chocolate but strongly suggested in the text on the page that it was poop, how many people would be prepared to promote that? A rape scene might be staged and models completely willing and happy about it, but does that make it OK to promote? If models are over 18 but look much younger, is that OK?

I have to agree with Walter. That page makes me want to run a mile. Whether it is legal or not the intention seems to be to feature youths who look under 18 and that idea is encouraged by the text.

I only promote guys who are over 18 and look over 18.[/QUOTE]

Oh please do not misunderstand my words. I’m not encouraging anyone promoting legal stuff as barely legal. I was talking about the old issue with 18yo+ models that look younger. Everyday I sort models and IDs and several times i tried to guess their age. Well, believe or not, I had a couple of 18yo that look like 25yo and several 22-23yo that look like 18yo. I’m sure you know who Kant is. What did he say? The truth is in the eyes of who sees something.

#9

Re: blboys.com banned from google.com

I know what you mean. Some models look younger and cuter on camera than they do in real life and you get a bit of a surprise when you see them through the viewfinder. I guess that’s why they’re models. It’s all to do with lenses, lighting, face shape and the way their skin looks on camera.

I remember a guy who was Mr GayUk one year. He looked amazing when facing the camera. But when I saw him at Pride from a side angle, he looked like a gorilla. He had a really squashed up face that worked on camera.

#10

Re: blboys.com banned from google.com

[QUOTE=DirtyRatStudios;13632]I know what you mean. Some models look younger and cuter on camera than they do in real life and you get a bit of a surprise when you see them through the viewfinder. I guess that’s why they’re models. It’s all to do with lenses, lighting, face shape and the way their skin looks on camera.

I remember a guy who was Mr GayUk one year. He looked amazing when facing the camera. But when I saw him at Pride from a side angle, he looked like a gorilla. He had a really squashed up face that worked on camera.[/QUOTE]

… lol, I can talk about my unlucky story with some dated boys rofl

I would add that assuming that a model is 18yo+ what for you is scary-barely-legal-looking for me is a common good looking boy. I was born in 1986. I’m 22yo and my target of guys is 18-24yo. For me they’re “normal”. For someone else into bears they’re crazy young.

#11

Re: blboys.com banned from google.com

I actually have a date with a 24 year old tonight LOL

And he isn’t a bear ;D

#12

Re: blboys.com banned from google.com

helix has been not paying people, bouncing checks and not answering their emails for a while now.

http://www.askdamagex.com/showthread.php?t=26382&highlight=helix
http://www.gaydemon.biz/showthread.php?t=1046&highlight=helixcash
http://www.gaydemon.biz/showthread.php?t=691&highlight=helixcash

[quote=InsaneSimon;13623]Those thumbs are linked to pornplays.com. I know the owner of pornplay.com and he’s a good guy, hard worker and really skilled adult webmaster. I’m sure that he doesn’t promote anything not/barely legal. The sponsor that he promotes on his galleries for those 3 thumbs are:

So 3 well known sponsors. Nothing wrong with them.[/quote]

#13

Re: blboys.com banned from google.com

[QUOTE=basschick;13635]helix has been not paying people, bouncing checks and not answering their emails for a while now.

http://www.askdamagex.com/showthread.php?t=26382&highlight=helix
http://www.gaydemon.biz/showthread.php?t=1046&highlight=helixcash
http://www.gaydemon.biz/showthread.php?t=691&highlight=helixcash[/QUOTE]

Yes, I’ve already read these threads and i was aware about this problem. I was talking about models and their age. My “nothing wrong” was about that.

#14

Re: blboys.com banned from google.com

i don’t trust people easily, and am rarely disappointed. someone i can’t trust for something important i choose not to trust for other stuff - especially if it seems iffy.

i could be wrong, but i seem to recall that one of the producers supplying content to helix involved in a model that wasn’t 18. can’t remember the name of the company - something kandy?

#15

Re: blboys.com banned from google.com

it was banned for “iffy” models?

#16

Re: blboys.com banned from google.com

Maybe because it had a page with “amateur pics” sent by users. No IDs, no releases, nothing rofl

#17

Re: blboys.com banned from google.com

Some of our models run close to the edge in terms of looking young, but that’s one of the reasons we don’t buy content from other companies is we don’t want the worry of wondering if the IDs are legit.

I do have to say that occasionally we’ll see our galleries next to a whole bunch of other galleries with guys that really do push way further to the limit than we do, and it does make me a little nervous to see our stuff there.

But I realize that there are people that probably don’t promote us because we’re too “edgy” for them.

So as long as you trust the sponsor, and you feel comfortable with what you see, then it’s your choice what you promote.

It would be interesting to know what caused Google to drop the site, though.

#18

Re: blboys.com banned from google.com

[QUOTE=basschick;13639]i don’t trust people easily, and am rarely disappointed. someone i can’t trust for something important i choose not to trust for other stuff - especially if it seems iffy.

i could be wrong, but i seem to recall that one of the producers supplying content to helix involved in a model that wasn’t 18. can’t remember the name of the company - something kandy?[/QUOTE]

if I well remember they were related to the hiv+ models in UK because they bought content from that producer but never reply to the emails about that. But I think that somebody un UK can help us to well remember that

#19

Re: blboys.com banned from google.com

Id dont see anything wrong with that page. Sure some of the Bucks stuff is very young looking but they range from that to broke straight boys and beli ami.

Some people do like younger looking guys. As longs as they are 18+ Im happy. I wouldnt promote Bucks Factory any more. I did their Dr site once, but they didnt get a single payout right first time.

#20

Re: blboys.com banned from google.com

im surprised no one has asked the really interesting question.

Why did they get banned, and how… I can see something must have happened because Google hasnt got a single page from that domain in its index.

I did however notice their Meta tag - “Young gay boys”. I think that says it all. Young on its own is fine, boys on its own fine… but together its really pushing it.